That's the main reason why i asked for it. I have my own repo, maybe that's why i'm not interested in [community]. But AUR have huge list of orphaned, outdated, obsolette packages. Most of them can be deleted, since they have no use now. I see them nearly everyday, and... Well, i think you catch that. AUR needs moderators. AUR must be clean. Sorry for my bad english =(
On 03/02/10 15:58, Andrea Fagiani wrote: > On 02/03/2010 02:41 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > >Am 03.02.2010 15:32, schrieb Lex Rivera: > >>Hi all. I wanna ask is it possible to become TU without [community] > >>maintaining, just as AUR moderator? > >I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position > >instead of calling it "Semi-TU". > > > >When I was a TU, I didn't care at all about moderating the AUR, and > >maybe other TUs feel the same and rather do packaging. Conversely, you > >don't seem to care about packaging but about AUR moderation. > > > >I am forwarding this to arch-dev-public for reference, but I guess > >ultimately the TUs have to decide. > > > > I also think there is a lot of work to be done "polishing" the AUR, > and that could be a good start.
