But several users stating there is a new version in stable and an Mail about it should get the maintainer in question start to think about it. Maybe it was just the cache especially if he's checking regular for new versions. As I wrote in the forum I have no problem with giving the package back.
2010/2/11 Lukáš Jirkovský <[email protected]>: > On 11 February 2010 05:16, Chris Giles <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thus far, I've provided two responses in a forum >> thread<http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=90779>. >> Based on certain factors, I'm not happy about losing this package and I want >> to reclaim its ownership. >> > > I guess that it was caused by web browser cache. Next time try > reloading page several times (or in Firefox use Ctrl + F5). > > Anyway there are some users which flag package out of date for no > reason (it happened to me that someone flagged my package but no new > version was out, it happened especially with svn packages) so I can > understand original maintainer unflagged it if he didn't saw new > version. > > Lukas >
