Recently, I have made great change and updated frequently. Now it is svn-r70. AUR is svn-r25, which is unstable and lack of many new features. In additional, wrong dependencies.
Isn't be good for a software owner to maintain its AUR package? On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Ronald van Haren <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:54 AM, [email protected] > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, there > > > > I am the author of ibus-sogoupycc ( > http://code.google.com/p/ibus-sogoupycc/ > > ). > > > > These package are currently in AUR: 'ibus-sogoupycc' and > > 'ibus-sogoupycc-svn' > > and are seriously outdated, currently maintained by another person. > > > > I tried to notify that person by email, but no response for several days. > > > > Please orphan these packages, so I can maintain these packages. > > > > Links: > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32200 > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31920 > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > seriously, ibus-sogoupycc-svn 25-1 is last updated 25th of February this > year? > > Ronald >
