On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 05:13:23 +0800 Ray Rashif <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 03/03/2010, Hilton Medeiros <[email protected]> wrote: > > I disagree. I believe the developer should have priority and be > > given the ownership as soon as possible. You don't have to wait the > > maintainer kiss good bye e hug the build. It is just a build script. > > I concur, but it's rude for us to just barge in like that. It's a > simple matter between the developer and the buildscript maintainer, so > it's best left up to them to contact each other, and then if the > maintainer tries anything funny (or does not try anything at all) we > disown it. > > A 7-day or next-weekend grace period is good for things like this (for > the maintainer to respond to the orphan request). I had once orphaned > a package for a developer who didn't even claim it (synfig*), but it > took me a while before I read and replied to the e-mail outlining a > build-related matter. > > > -- > GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD I understand, just thought the process was a little too much bureaucratic for the developer. I maintain some packages and I would not feel violated by the TUs over something like this but maybe that is just me. I don't think it would be rudeness but maybe I'm really kinda rude, so my words don't count for much. :) Cheers
