On Fri, 28 May 2010 16:11:29 +0200 Alexander Rødseth <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > Thanks for a well-written post, Peter. > > 2010/5/27 Ionut Biru <[email protected]>: > > do you want to became a TU and maintain correctly in community? > > They way things are done in AUR, where packages are orhpaned and then > maintained by volunteers, is a system that seems to work. > The quality of the AUR packages can be so-so, but they don't go > unmaintained or broken for long if there are enough people that care. > I'm sure there are more than enough people that care about Haskell, as > it is an alluring language that carries with it a promise to be > theoretically sound. > > Changing the focus from finding a general solution to what Peter might > choose to do does not seem construcive to me. > Not handling Haskell-packages in a special non-maintained way would be > more constructive. > I don't think a one-man-army Arch Haskell Team will improve the > situation, no matter how clever that person may be. > > Best regards, > Alexander Rødseth This should be the place to discuss this: http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell It doesn't seem to be unmaintained. Cheers.
