On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Nathan O. <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am sorry I am human and make mistakes. > > > On 06/02/2010 06:45 PM, enderst wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Nathan O.<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Sorry I never think about it, but even if the package is needed, the >>> current package I am requesting to be deleted is junkbuster and it seems >>> to >>> be discontinued >>> >>> On 06/02/2010 05:28 PM, Peter Lewis wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On Wednesday 02 Jun 2010 at 21:27 Nathan O. wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Can somebody delete http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8306 The >>>>> homepage has changed and so has the pkgname >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I'm not a TU or anything, so this is just a personal request. When >>>> people >>>> request package deletions, could they put the name of the package >>>> somewhere in >>>> the email (preferably the subject)? Following this thread, it's not >>>> possible >>>> to tell which package was deleted. >>>> >>>> I tend to follow this list to track changes / deletions to packages I >>>> use, >>>> and >>>> once the packages are deleted the links to the AUR pages obviously no >>>> longer >>>> work. >>>> >>>> Thanks :-) >>>> >>>> Pete. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> ummm no that is not always the case with you. there are a few pkgs you >> were >> wrong about and they were still good. luckily the tu(s) that caught that >> was >> on the ball. >> >> +1 pkgname with the link. >> >> > Don't get me wrong Nathan, I think its great you're reporting pkgs for deletion. I think adding the pkgname with the link will help the process. cheers
