On 12 June 2010 23:40, Stefan Husmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 12.06.2010 19:06, schrieb Sergej Pupykin: >>> >>> On 06/12/2010 07:54 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote: >>>> >>>> this is a proposal to remove nextaw from community. It is not needed by >>>> any community package. It once was a dependency of siag-office, which >>>> has been moved to unsupported long ago and is still unmaintained there. >> >> I am not against removing, but as I understand >> http://siag.nu/neXtaw/usage.shtml nextaw is drop in replacement of >> libXaw. So all packages which depend on libxaw can be used with nextaw. >> > > According to pkgstats not many people do so (0.13 %). > > Cite: "Just replace libXaw.* or libXaw3d.* with libneXtaw.so.?.? and make > all symlinks > that were pointing to libXaw point to libneXtaw " > > That means to me, the user has to manually set symlinks, an if he is able to > understand this and to do so, he should also be able to compile from a > PKGBUILD in AUR.
Taking the replacement into consideration, judging from pkgstats, I vote for removal. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD
