On 14 June 2010 22:43, Peter Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > On Monday 14 Jun 2010 at 17:23 Ray Rashif wrote: >> On 14 June 2010 14:00, Peter Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: >> > kdeplasma-addons-applets-daisy >> > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31392 >> > >> > is unmaintained and duplicates >> > >> > plasma-daisy-plasmoid >> > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25203 >> > >> > so can probably be safely deleted. >> > >> > Incidentally, is there any naming convention for KDE plasmoid packages? A >> > quick search reveals a whole range of approaches: >> > >> > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?O=0&K=plasm&do_Search=Go >> > >> > Appending -plasmoid seems the most popular, but having kdeplasma-addons >> > or something simliar at the start of the package name also seems >> > sensible. >> > >> >From [ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=plasma ]: >> kdeplasma-addons-applets-${plasmoid} >> >> Since the one following the naming convention is unmaintained, I would >> suggest adopting it with the contents of the other one. But I have no >> problem with deleting it, since it meets most of the criteria for >> removal. > > Sounds sensible - I'm happy to adopt the unmaintained one, but I notice that > Bram Schoenmakers is maintaining the other version so should have first > refusal.
Yes, it would be up to Bram. He could either: 1) keep on maintaining current package 2) disown current package and adopt the orphan 3) disown current package and let someone else (you) adopt the orphan -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD
