Talked to the maintainer on IRC, reached a consensus to delete this. Done.
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Andres P <[email protected]> wrote: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27730 > Maintainer: djszapi > > * vimball is included in the default vim distribution, so what's the point of > packaging it? It's just duplicating the job that the vim maintainer is doing. > > * It is packaged very badly. It installs files to > /usr/share/vim/{plugin,autoload,doc} instead of using usr/share/vim/vimfiles. > Maybe the maintainer realised that it conflicted with the identical files > already included in the vim distribution. Although these one's are in > vim72... > > Andres P >
