On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 5:23 PM, xandry <[email protected]> wrote: > Good. But what sense in it if nvidia-utils-beta gives the same functional > (besides for two architectures)? > > Stefan Husmann <[email protected]> писал(а) в своём письме Tue, 29 > Jun 2010 02:38:18 +0600: > >> Am 28.06.2010 21:37, schrieb xandry: >>> >>> Hi. Please delete packages: >>> >>> lib32-nvidia-utils-173.14.18-1 >>> (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24998) >>> lib32-nvidia-utils-173.14.20-1 >>> (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29042) >>> It's out of date, orphans, not support by upstream and are substituted >>> lib32-nvidia-utils-173xx (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29043) >>> >>> lib32-nvidia-utils-180.29-3 >>> (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24710) >>> Out of date, not support by upstream and it is substituted >>> extra/nvidia-utils >>> >>> lib32-nvidia-utils-beta (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19453) >>> nvidia-utils-all-beta (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37902) >>> Are substituted nvidia-utils-beta >>> (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19224) >>> >>> >> >> removed all except lib32-nvidia-utils-beta >> (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19453), which seems to be actively >> maintained. > > >
I believe it's because lib32-nvidia-utils-beta provides 32bit files for 64bit architecture.
