On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Xyne <[email protected]> wrote: > > I resent your characterization of my post_install function as abuse. > No .install files were harmed in the making of my arch32-light > package. :)
Ah, I think I must have been taken a bit too literally here. I was actually quoting your own description of how arch32-light does its work =). I myself think its a good way to set up a chroot, and should probably be considered the 'canonical' way currently (if I'm not wrong, you basically automate most of the steps in the 32-bit chroot wiki). I was actually talking about a package/script to handle chroot maintenance generally, where your pacman32 is specific to the arch32-light package. Of course, having bauerbill handle that for me would be lovely =)
