On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 10:14:57 -0500 Thomas Dziedzic <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Laurent Carlier > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would like to start a talk about packages that can be moved to > > aur, for various reasons, not only because they are orphaned, but > > essencially due to lack of maintainance upstream. > > > > Feel free to comment and add other packages. > > > > striim: > > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/striim/ > > Project seem dead upstream, better alternatives exist > > > > xf4vnc-xcliplistproto > > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/xf4vnc-xcliplistproto/ > > Depend on a cvs snapshot from 2007, not update for 3 years (project > > is dead ?) > > > > xf4vnc-vncproto > > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/xf4vnc-vncproto/ > > Similar to xf4vnc-xcliplistproto > > > > sfarkxtc > > http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/sfarkxtc/ > > Binary only, x86 only (x86_64 with lib32), doesn't seem maintain > > upstream > > > > ....... > > > > I did > grep -R pkgname /var/abs/community > for all of them and nothing depends on them. > > I also think these should be removed.
I agree, however I'd say the active maintainers should also be asked. -- Jabber: [email protected] Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
