On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 16:04 +0200, Peter Simons wrote: > Well, when a Haskell package is obviously out-of-date on AUR and someone > offers to take over maintenance, then disown it and let that person > handle the package. That's the way it's done for everything else, and > the procedure seems to work fine. It's a mystery to me why the ArchLinux > team deviated from that procedure for Haskell packages in the first > place. > > Take care, > Peter
Wasn't there a Haskell update script that automatically did the updating?
