On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Jonathan Conder <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 07:24 -0500, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: > > Going through the bug reports, it seems that you have a keen eye and > don't > > let bugs go unnoticed. > > Thanks :) > > > That said, I am a little bothered by the amount of packages you do > maintain > > currently in the aur which is only 6. > > > > Since you do have such a small amount of packages, I will ask, what are > your > > goals after you become a TU? > > Fair enough. The main reason I maintain only those packages is that > everything else I use from the AUR already has a maintainer. Becoming a > TU would presumably allow me to adopt other people's packages and put > them in community. Also, MythTV + plugins makes up 12 packages already. > > Anyway, I just saw your second email. With that vague list I wasn't > talking about the AUR, but rather packages that could be adopted within > the repos, like MythTV is at the moment. I'm not really sure what those > are exactly (or if there are any), hence the lack of specifics. > > Here is a longer list of AUR packages that I could possibly pick up: > > bin32-skype (if policy allows) > desmume > fbsplash > fbsplash-extras > fbsplash-theme-arch-black > fbsplash-themes-arch-banner > gap-math* > gnome-colors-icon-theme > gnome-packagekit > gummi > lightning > mediatomb[-svn] > myththeme-blue-abstract* > nautilus-makepkg* > nspluginwrapper-debian > nspluginwrapper-flash > packagekit > pacman-glib > python-poppler > > I've starred the ones that aren't that popular, but are interesting to > me personally. Also, I'm not ready to release PackageKit-related stuff > quite yet, but I would hope that it would be reasonably popular when I > make a proper announcement. > > Jonathan > > P.S. Thanks Allan > > Thanks. +1 from me
