On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:18:30 +0200 Philipp Überbacher <[email protected]> wrote: > Besides that, I think it's future proof. > One issue though is that the meaning of: > ('GPL2' 'GPL3') > isn't the same as: > 'GPL2 or later' > It only is practically the same because there's nothing beyond GPL3 > yet.
Just out of curiosity... Supposed, there is a GPL4 around at some time in the future. Now, if I receive some software under the terms of "GPL2 or later", would it be in my right, to redistribute said software under "GPL3 only" as opposed to "GPL3 or later"?
