On Friday, 10 September 2010, 17:40:35 Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > It looks like in this case the content of the portable zip is identicaly > (just about) to the content of the deb, just that the debs are > arch-specific.
That describes the situation very well. Moreover, the debs contain a .desktop and a .png file, whereas the zip file does not, and the zip version looks for the configuration file in some sub-sub-subfolder, not in /etc. Christoph
