Am 16.09.2010 16:30, schrieb Lukas Fleischer: > Hi, > > Just wrote a small script to check for duplicate package names in the > AUR and the official repos and created a list of duplicates. For each of > the packages I quickly checked AUR and [extra]/[community] package > versions, AUR comments and whether there seem to be some additional > patches in the AUR version. It might be better to double check tho... > > The following packages already are in [extra] and AUR versions seem to > be equivalent or outdated: > > - gcin: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39653 > - gthumb: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27129 > - libwpg: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25652 > - perl-class-factory-util: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25955 > - perl-class-inspector: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10540 > - perl-datetime-format-builder: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25956 > - perl-datetime-format-strptime: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9334 > - perl-image-size: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3286 > - perl-time-hires: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35514 > - perl-xml-parser: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40119 > - v4l-utils: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38218 > - xpyb: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19975 > > Following packages already are in [community] and AUR versions seem to > be equivalent or outdated: > > - cadaver: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8635 > - cksfv: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8688 > - evas-svn: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19315 > - gpsbabel: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37028 > - kim4: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38648 > - ktoblzcheck: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9104 > - lwp: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8703 > - perl-parse-recdescent: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36080 > - pulseaudio-mixer-applet: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24016 > - qoauth: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28485 > - remmina: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38933 > - springlobby: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39670 > - urbanterror-data: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21493 > - winegame: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37828 > - winestuff: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37829 > - wmctrl: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1294 > - lib32-alsa-oss: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12815 > - lib32-ati-dri: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29742 > - lib32-intel-dri: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24770 > - lib32-libmng: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20890 > - lib32-libstdc++5: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11191 > > Quite a few packages that are already in the official repos are > maintained by the Arch Haskell team in the AUR. I'm not sure what to do > with them. These packages include: > > - darcs: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39679 > - happy: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26280 > - gtk2hs-buildtools: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37478 > - haskell-cgi, haskell-dataenc, haskell-deepseq, > haskell-extensible-exceptions, haskell-hashed-storage, > haskell-haskeline, haskell-hunit, haskell-mmap, haskell-quickcheck, > haskell-regex-base, haskell-regex-compat, haskell-regex-posix, > haskell-stm, haskell-terminfo > > Following packages should probably stay in the AUR although they're > duplicates, check AUR comments: > > - awesome: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13038 > - q4wine: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36728 > - sk1: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16559 > - sk1libs: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35066 > > gadmin-samba (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40599) seems to > be newer than the package in [community] but the project homepage says > the [community] package is still up-to-date. Maybe the AUR version is an > unstable release? > > sleuthkit (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2012) and the > sleuthkit package in [community] seem to have some differences in the > PKGBUILD. Not sure what to do, check AUR comments. > > So far... Hope that helps :) > > Regards, > Lukas > Hello,
thank you for your very long list. Can you provide your script somewhere, maybe in AUR? I removed all of the mentioned PKGBUILDS. Regardless if they are written differently or are even better than the ones in the repos: The AUR is not the place for packages equally named with packages in the repos. Regards Stefan
