On 24 September 2010 05:34, Brad Fanella <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't think what I'm saying here is being clearly understood. :-(
Sorry, I missed the whole Det business. All in all, that kind of contribution (what Det appears to be doing) is not encouraged, but it _is_ somewhat of a contribution. From the way I see it, he's just a concerned party, preemptive about the fate of a particular package. But yes, he's definitely not maintaining any package if all he does is adopt, update, disown. He's just Robin Hood, or..
