On 26/09/10 01:53, Loui Chang wrote: > On Mon 20 Sep 2010 11:16 +0200, Simon Legner wrote: >> do we really need three packages of the OCaml library ocamlgraph >> [1]? The packages are all up-to-date, but maintained by three >> different users. The correctest one according to the specified >> dependencies IMHO is ocamlgraph-withoutfindlib [2], which also has >> the minimal code for building the package. >> What do you think? > > I would think the the most correct one should be renamed to > ocaml-ocamlgraph, and the rest deleted. You guys can sort that out and > report back. Cheers.
ocamlgraph[1] has been orphaned, so I suggest first of all to remove it. Then we'll work out which of the other two to keep. /M [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21687 -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
