On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 03:18:19AM +0800, Ray Rashif wrote: > On 4 October 2010 03:11, Konstantinos Karantias <[email protected]> wrote: > > But also, orphaning all the packages that fit into this category is unsure. > > > > Some people may have orphaned the for fun or something. It has happened to > > me many times. > > Please post your replies below quotes. > > Anyway, we cannot mass-orphan them without checking. It is simply not > right, no matter the statistics. For example, cutegod [1] is owned by > Dragonlord, a TU. He might have his reasons. Like him, many others who > are not TUs might have their reasons. > > Anyway, I consider this more of a TODO. > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14119
Well, in most cases, they are flagged out of date for a good reason. For example, cutegod no longer has a project page up nor is the actual source available. How 'bout someone writes up something nice such as the "Python 2.7/3.1 package list" on the Dev interface? -- Brad
