Hi,
I adopted [3] recently (updated and cleaned-up the PKGBUILD), and
would like to add that [1] and [2] indicate the wrong licence.
The fonts are released under the Ubuntu Font Licence, not GPL.

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Stefan Husmann
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Am 12.10.2010 22:22, schrieb Simon Legner:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the AUR package ttf-ubuntu-beta [1] is outdated and replaced by the packages 
>> mentioned below. I'd remove it.
>>
>> ttf-ubuntu-family-fonts [2] and ttf-ubuntu-font-family [3] provide the new 
>> ubuntu font. The former package uses a package name not complying with the 
>> source filename. Further on it uses strange version numbers and it is built 
>> using a source archive from font.ubuntu.com, but uses only the precompiled 
>> ttf-files. Therefore the download 2.3MB instead of 0.7MB seems unnecessary.
>>
>> Please consider deletion of ttf-ubuntu-beta [1] and ttf-ubuntu-family-fonts 
>> [2].
>>
>> Regards,
>> Simon
>>
>> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40402
>> [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41204
>> [3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41465
>>
>
> Did you contact the author of [1] and [2]? He seems to be active, at least 
> with [2].
>
> [2] is older than [3] and has mor votes.
>
> Regards Stefan
>

Reply via email to