Am 24.10.2010 19:09, schrieb Smartboy:
> On 10/24/2010 10:06 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
>> 2010/10/24 Lukáš Jirkovský<[email protected]>:
>>> On 24 October 2010 17:42, Smartboy<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Today I noticed that in AUR there are two packages which seem to do the
>>>> same
>>>> thing, one named Aptana[1] and the other Aptana-Studio[2]. Looks like
>>>> Aptana-Studio is much newer than Aptana with fewer votes, and was created
>>>> initially instead of ophraning Aptana. Therefore, I propose Aptana-Studio
>>>> to
>>>> be deleted.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Smartboy
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7147
>>>> [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31634
>>>>
>>> Aptana-Studio has much better PKGBUILD.
>> And it's got the right name. Aptana is the company.
> Then should Aptana be deleted? Seems confusing to me to have both Aptana and
> Aptana-Studio which do the same thing.
>
> Smartboy
>
Yes, and done.
