On Saturday 20 November 2010 23:37:55 Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 17:27 +0000, Peter Lewis wrote: > > On Saturday 20 November 2010 17:22:34 Florian Pritz wrote: > > > On 20.11.2010 17:56, Peter Lewis wrote: > > > > So, the idea would be to keep dovecot in [community] > > > > > > dovecot is in extra. > > > > Yeah, dovecot is in extra, maintained by Andreas. Personally, I'd be even > > happier for pigeonhole to go in there too and for the two to be built > > together each version bump, but I don't have that power :-) > > Just a user comment, it can get a bit frustrating when direct > dependencies like these are in community/extra (different maintainers). > vlc-pulse-plugin for example (though that's not a good example, its > normally updated within 12 hours). > > Maintaining together is a win, from my perspective =)
I agree, and if Andy wants to take on pigeonhole in extra, then that's fine with me :-) I think having pigeonhole in community like this is at least better than having it in the AUR, since people were losing mails if they didn't notice a dovecot upgrade and hence didn't recompile pigeonhole. Pete.
