On Sunday 21 November 2010 10:41:02 Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > Hi, I just adopted tap-plugins[1], updated and cleaned it up. > tap-plugins-cvs[2] should IN MY OPINION be deleted, it does not serve > any purpose above tap-plugins (the description talks about bsb but the > package does not actually provide it). The problem is that louderbox[3] > depends on tap-plugins-cvs. > > How to resolve?
> Ideally I'd think [3] should depend on [1] Yeah, that would be ideal in my opinion. [3]'s package was last updated in March, and probably depended on some functionality in tap-plugins not yet released. If whatever that functionality is is now in [1] then yeah I'd say go ahead and make it depend on the non-cvs version. > and [2] deleted. Not sure I see the reason why this should happen. Isn't it normal to keep -vcs packages around in case others want to try out the latest commits? > [1]http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8361 > [2]http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20098 > [3]http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33604 Pete.
