On 26 November 2010 18:23, Peter Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday 26 November 2010 08:44:56 Philipp Überbacher wrote: >> Excerpts from Peter Lewis's message of 2010-11-25 16:57:26 +0100: >> > On Thursday 25 November 2010 13:58:13 Joao Cordeiro wrote: >> > > fftw2double >> > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6936 >> > > >> > > Same as fftw2 at community. >> > >> > The AUR package uses the additional compiler flag --enable-threads. Does >> > that do anything important here which might warrant it being kept as a >> > separate pacakge? >> > >> > Pete. >> >> fftw-threads does the same and more, as far as I can see. The rezound >> maintainers should adapt their packages though. >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30594 > > Well fftw-threads is version 3 and it seems that even the latest version of > rezound still depends on version 2.x (they explicitly say not version 3 yet). > The question is whether or not it can run with fftw2 from [community] or not.
Confirmed. fftw2double needs to stay. It doesn't conflict with fftw2 anyway (different library name), and rezound depends on it exclusively. Rezound does not build against fftw2 or fftw(-threads).
