On Tuesday 30 November 2010 16:38:42 Andrea Scarpino wrote: > On 30 November 2010 17:36, Peter Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > > Does anyone know of a reason why the bin32- acroread packages can't be > > deleted? The standard acroread packages support both arches now. > > > > (Just thought I'd check I wasn't missing anything before getting trigger > > happy...) > > Which one have to be deleted?
Sorry, should have included some specifics: Well, bin32-acroread (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7906) appears to be superceded by acroread (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16980) and likewise with: bin32-acroread-ja / acroread-ja bin32-acroread-de / acroread-de The other language ones haven't been converted though (yet), except acroread- fi, for which there's just the one package. Pete.
