On Sun 05 Dec 2010 00:15 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > On 12/05/2010 12:07 AM, Loui Chang wrote: > >On Sat 04 Dec 2010 23:59 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > >>On 12/04/2010 11:53 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: > >>>On 5 December 2010 05:46, Loui Chang<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>On Sat 04 Dec 2010 22:19 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > >>>>>On 12/03/2010 12:06 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>I'm waiting to see your replies and then act based on them. > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>i don't see this being discuss any further and all messages have been > >>>>>only > >>>>>in one direction. > >>>>> > >>>>>i modified his account on aur to normal user. Ranguvar, i'm sorry for > >>>>>this > >>>>>and when you'll have time again you should consider applying again. > >>>>> > >>>>>Loui can you disable his account on sigurd? > >>>>>Andrea can you remove his privileges from bugtracker and forum? > >>>> > >>>>You still need to create a voting proposal. > >>>>Why doesn't anyone read the damned bylaws? > >>> > >>>I myself thought there would be voting, but I just realised Ionut > >>>inferred that we needn't vote from the following: > >>> > >>>"for which standard voting procedure deviates from the above." > >>> > >> > >>above being the voting procedure and from my understanding what is the > >>opposite of having a voting? NO voting. > >> > >> > >>we had this situation in the past and we didn't had any voting procedure. we > >>just removed it and we continued our business. > >> > >>with or without the vote, the result would be the same. And to be fair, we > >>are investing too much time in the removal, even more that he invested in > >>community. > > > >Then don't waste any time on it. Leave it alone. > >But if you do want to remove a Trusted User you MUST follow the bylaws. > >Three days discussion and Five days of voting for removal due to > >inactivity. Read the bloody bylaws. > > > > maybe i lack the understanding of words and to quote from bylaws: > > "The removal of a Trusted User may also occur at any time. > > A motion must be made by at least two active Trusted Users for the removal > of a Trusted User. (THIS IS ME) > Following the motion, standard voting procedure commences with a discussion > period of 7 days. > > There is one special case for removal, removal due to unwarranted and > undeclared inactivity, for which standard voting procedure deviates from the > above."
The problem is your eyes stopped reading where you wanted them to stop. The next two sentences read: > This motion is also automatically triggered by repeated quorum > offenses, as described in the Quorum subsection of this document. For > this special case, SVP is followed with a discussion period of three > days, a quorum of 66%, and a voting period of 5 days. You can't just pick and choose the passage that fits best for goal. You need to take the bylaws in their entirety.
