On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:26 PM, keenerd <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've also come across a bug in the AUR. In short, the tarball URL > provided by the RPC interface is different from the tarball taken from > the html page. The RPC tarball is *exactly* what was uploaded. While > the html tarball has been sanitized. > ...
Christopher Brannon also mentioned this on the aur-dev list, giving links to the flyspray bug reports as well: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2010-November/001345.html I don't understand why the URLPath RPC field is necessary if the source package files always have the same predictable URL... -- -Justin
