On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 14:21:55 -0600 Brad Fanella <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Stefan Husmann > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Am 08.01.2011 20:27, schrieb Brad Fanella: > >> So with the recent release of apvlv 0.1.0, I have decided to drop > >> maintaining it. > >> > >> I believe it now supports UMD file reading of some sort, and this > >> requires the whole the PSP toolchain to be packaged and submitted > >> to the repo, which is something I have no interest in doing > >> whatsoever, as I haven't even used the software in months. > >> > >> Any takers (TUs of course)? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Brad > >> > > Hello, > > > > what about not supporting umd files? There is an configure-option > > "--without-umd"? > > > > I can take it back, but I am not interested in supporting umd, too. > > > > Regards Stefan > > > > I was contemplating doing that, but I assumed that that was considered > a "downstream modification", and would take away some functionality of > the software, therefore not allowed. > > I have no problem keeping it if I do not have to build with UMD > support. > > Regards, > Brad
You don't have to bring that, if some functionality can be modified using configure/make commands, there's no one who can complain, upstream made it possible, so it is obviously also in their intent to let people build it with features they need. If a user needs it, but not the majority of users, well, we have abs, not much of a deal to do a modified rebuild for what one needs. Though I'm a bit confused, I myself own a PSP (old FAT/1000 model) and UMDs are the "caged" hardware disks, an ebook reader for this? Sure they don't mean another format for document files? -- Jabber: [email protected] Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
