On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 09:56, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: > On 14/01/11 19:45, Peter Simons wrote: >> >> Is there some sort of consensus among AUR maintainers how to deal with >> that kind of situation? If an AUR package is current, so to speak, but it >> doesn't compile, then what should be done with it? >> > > I'd say that is what the comment section is for.
I was initially set on not getting involved in this discussion, but I think it's worth pointing out that the ArchHaskell team does have an issue tracker (on github) for the "Haskell ABS" tree. So putting a link to an issue in a comment is always an option. /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: [email protected] jabber: [email protected] twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus
