On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Martti Kühne <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:44:10PM +0100, Seblu wrote: >>> Yes great. I'm not paid by package i maintain. >>> Do not misunderstand my intentions, this package is more often used >>> without gtk (subjective). >>> It's a really useful package for debugging network issues and got it >>> in a server is a plus. >>> Server => no gtk => no user repository packages. This was my reasoning. >> > > I find this a really good idea, there is no reason for mtr to require > X to be running. So I suggest moving mtr-gtk into aur and having a > "sane" mtr package using the cli interface (on which ARCH users are so > keen :-P -- ). > > mar77i >
Why do you suggest that? Can't we have "mtr" (which is the CLI version) and "mtr-gtk" in the repos? Just curious. Regards, Brad
