On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Loui Chang <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri 21 Jan 2011 21:38 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote: >> On 01/21/2011 09:10 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> >Seblu wrote: >> >>It looks like a trick question! >> >>But if I want to be a good maintainer, I do understand the reasons. >> >> >> >>and **The trust does not exclude the audit.** >> > >> >Excuse me for asking but is there anything preventing you from moving >> >cairo-xcb to community if you become a TU? >> >> Yes, us. >> >> >As far as i know if you become a TU you can maintain anything you want >> >that has more than 10 votes in the AUR. >> >> Becoming a TU means that you become a member in the developement team, a >> team in which we trust each other, respect each other decisions, use the >> same packaging standards, the same tools as developers etc. > > I think if the package meets the guidelines then you shouldn't bully > someone into not maintaining it. As long as he's providing the support > that should suffice. Sometimes we may need to adjust the guidelines, and > we decide this as a group through a formal vote. >
Seriously? Since when is adding a package that is already in the repos with a different configure flag a good idea? We don't even allow this in the AUR... Ronald
