On 02/01/2011 07:24 PM, Andres Perera wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Nathan Owens<[email protected]> wrote:
It appears that my package of fossil-scm
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30182
is the same as https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44774
mine has been around longer and only difference I see in the the later
package from lavandero is that he/she added
"make -j1 bld bld/headers"
- Your package uses an HTML file instead of a plain text license
- The LICENSE is included in the source distribution
- Because make -j1 bld/bldheaders wasn't present, your package had a race
condition when building with parallel jobs (this has been fixed upstream)
- "fossil" is the upstream name, not fossil-scm
- If you check the AUR comments, I cover all of dis and offer my pkg to you or
whoever is willing (and fossil-scm gets scrapped)
If fossil-scm is to be deleted, you can keep fossil or I will take it if
you don't want it. Either way works.
