On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 14:03 +0000, Magnus Therning wrote: > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 13:49, Nicky726 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Could that be that I get Arch's mailing lists as diggests and reply to them > > in > > the client and copy the subject of the particular message. Am I supposed to > > do > > it in a different way? (Possibly with keeping the messages delivered in a > > digest, not every separetely). > > Now as this is a reply to a directly delivered message, it should fit > > correctly. I didn't touch the subject field in this case at all. > > Btw, thax you're trying to debug my issues. > > I don't usually subscribe in digest-mode, but I vaguely recall that > there's a setting to get the digest in the form where each message is > a MIME attachment to the digest message (if that makes sense). When I > did that then my MUA, mutt, could open each attachment as an email and > I could reply from that view, which resulted in the correct > In-Reply-To and In-Relation-To values. I'm not a user of KMail myself > so you'll have to experiment with it to see if it behaves the same way > as mutt ;-) > > /M > On other MLs I'm on the general perception is that if you plan to reply, please don't use digests. In other words, digest subscriptions should be considered 'read-only', precisely because of the thread-breaking behaviour.
Magnus' solution sounds nifty though, if you can get it working.
