On 04/12/11 at 10:00pm, Stefan Husmann wrote: > On 12.04.2011 08:58, Peter Lewis wrote: > >Done a bit of research... > > > >On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Stefan Husmann wrote: > >> irssi (VCS) > >> * irssi-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6163 > >> * irssi-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25781 > > > >These both seem "official", though the main website points to the SVN repo > >and > >not the git one. However, it seems many contributors are using git since it's > >easier to send in patches etc. I couldn't find out how often they're synced, > >but > >I assume it's pretty regular. So, it's probably worth either keeping both, or > >just going with git only. > > > > > I prefer maintaining svn-versions over git-versions in AUR, because the have > revision numbers as $pkgver, not just a date. > > Regards Stefan
I maintain irssi-svn, but only picked it up some time ago because it needed fix/updating. So no big deal if y'all decide it should go. I suppose as the discussion on this has grown cold I'll assume we're going to keep both? Seem no real conscience was reached. I'll drop/delete it if needed. JB
pgpjvEvIR9I6S.pgp
Description: PGP signature
