On Tuesday 10 May 2011 12:11:56 Guillaume ALAUX wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Package "tomcat-fhs" [0] from AUR is an out-of-date duplicate of [1] with no
> particular improvement (along with strange naming).
> 
> I would thus vote for deletion of "tomcat-fhs" [0] even though it seems it
> was submitted first.
> 
> [0] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14324
> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19452
Done

-- 
Andrea

Reply via email to