On 15 May 2011 05:33, rafael ff1 <[email protected]> wrote: > PCSX2 Dev Team provides pcsx2 in two ways: binary tarball and svn > source code. I'd like to organize things up about this emulator in > AUR: my plan is to have "pcsx2" [1] as binary package and "pcsx2-svn" > [2] getting from source code. > > Considering that the maintainer of pcsx2-bin [3] does not update > neither reply emails for more than a week and that pcsx2-svn-bin [4] > is maintained by me and it's equal to pcsx2-bin, my request is to > delete these two packages. > > Thanks in advance, > > Rafael (username: josephgbr) > > Links: > [1] pcsx2 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10268 > [2] pcsx2-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21899 > [3] pcsx2-bin https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33449 > [4] pcsx2-svn-bin https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31863 >
I removed [4] as I see you already take over the [1]. However I'm not sure whether pcsx2-bin should be removed, the maintainer seems to be active. If there is no source package I personally prefer the pcsx2 name (without the -bin suffix). I CCed this email to matthewbauer, so he could share his opinion on this topic. Lukas
