On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 05:32, Alexander Rødseth <[email protected]> wrote: > I like both the idea of it being possible to change the names of > packages and the patch. > But, what about dependencies? Should they be left dangling? > > - Alexander Rødseth >
This patch leaves the pkgname in the PKGBUILD as the old name. Probably not an issue, but the maintainer would have to submit an updated PKGBUILD after the name change.
