I think renaming a package should be slightly cumbersome, and not that easy. Just one rename has the potential to create work for dozens of package maintainers because of dependency issues. Let's say that maintainers has to upload 10 updated packages per rename, and that there are 10 renames a day, it would be quite a bit of overall extra work, with some breakage and no clear win, except more total consistency of the system as a whole. (Of course, these are made-up numbers and may not be accurate...).
- Re: [aur-general] [PATCH 1/1] TUs can change package na... D. Can Celasun
- Re: [aur-general] [PATCH 1/1] TUs can change packa... Evangelos Foutras
- Re: [aur-general] [PATCH 1/1] TUs can change p... Evangelos Foutras
- Re: [aur-general] [PATCH 1/1] TUs can change p... D. Can Celasun
- Re: [aur-general] [PATCH 1/1] TUs can change packa... Lukáš Jirkovský
- Re: [aur-general] [PATCH 1/1] TUs can change p... D. Can Celasun
- Re: [aur-general] [PATCH 1/1] TUs can change p... Jakob Gruber
- Re: [aur-general] [PATCH 1/1] TUs can change p... D. Can Celasun
- Re: [aur-general] [PATCH 1/1] TUs can change p... Ray Rashif
- Re: [aur-general] [PATCH 1/1] TUs can change p... D. Can Celasun
- Re: [aur-general] [PATCH 1/1] TUs can change p... Alexander Rødseth
- Re: [aur-general] [PATCH 1/1] TUs can change p... D. Can Celasun
- Re: [aur-general] [PATCH 1/1] TUs can change package na... Lukas Fleischer
- Re: [aur-general] [PATCH 1/1] TUs can change packa... D. Can Celasun
