2011/6/27 Jeremiah Dodds <[email protected]>:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Xyne <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  prefer "apache-mod_name"
>>
>
> Big +1, it's consistent and clear what the package is, and is likely to turn
> up in common searches.
>

Would this be a case for adding apache modules in Arch Package
Standards' Guideline ? [1]

[1] 
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards#Additional_Guidelines

-- Rafael

Reply via email to