On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Uli Armbruster <[email protected]> wrote: > * Uli Armbruster <[email protected]> [22.06.2011 13:33]: >> * Heiko Baums <[email protected]> [22.06.2011 13:22]: >> > Am Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:18:04 +0200 >> > schrieb Uli Armbruster <[email protected]>: >> > >> > > Here's the link https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49992 >> > > I reuploaded under the name mkvmerge-gui because the name fits better >> > > (I also added mmg and mkvtoolnix to the description, so it can be >> > > found as good as possible) >> > > >> > > And here's the link to mkvtoolnix-nogui >> > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41546 This isn't needed >> > > anymore, because repo's mkvtoolnix removed the mkvmerge-gui mmg. A >> > > package called eunektes requires this version, but I informed the >> > > maintainer in the comment section to adjust the dependency. >> > > >> > > Merci beaucoup >> > >> > Isn't it better to call the packages mkvmerge-gtk and mkvmerge-cli? >> > It's the usual naming convention in the repos and in AUR. >> > >> > Heiko >> >> Well, I could do that too, you're right. In my opinion *-gui is fine, >> because .. well it IS the gui of mkvmerge ;) And most importantly, I named >> it that way, because the real name of mmg is "mkvmerge GUI", so I had the >> choice between "mkvmergegui" or "mkvmerge-gui". I chose the latter, because >> it looks better ;) >> >> But honestly, I don't care, if it's called *-gui or *-gtk. If it's really >> convention (I haven't found this anywhere after a quick search like in >> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards#Package_Naming) >> or if TUs thing *-gtk is better, I'll be happy to reupload it with that >> name. > > Just remembered, this package is still there. Could anyone please delete it? > Or make me TU for a day and I'll do it myself ;) (kidding!) > > Regards > Army >
Done. Both pkg deleted.
