On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 00:58, Heiko Baums <[email protected]> wrote: > Am Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:47:03 +0530 > schrieb "KESHAV P.R." <[email protected]>: > >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 00:36, KESHAV P.R. <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > Please delete grub-gfx >> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2416 . Although it has >> > more votes, I modified the PKGBUILD a bit and replaced the package >> > with grub-legacy-gfx >> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50986 which builds fine >> > in x86_64 system with gcc-multilib. Thanks in advance. >> > >> > Regards. >> > >> > Keshav >> > >> >> Bump. anyone? > > I would keep grub-gfx and remove grub-legacy-gfx. The package in [core] > is also called grub and not grub-legacy. And the source package is also > called grub-0.97.tar.gz and not grub-legacy-0.97.tar.gz. So grub-gfx is > the better name. > > Heiko >
I mentioned "current" upstream naming. According to upstream, presently grub2 aka grub 1.9x == grub and grub 0.97 == grub-legacy . I have also submittted a grub-legacy PKGBUILD to Allan for inclusion in official repo (grub itself may be removed from core repo, who knows). The source tarball name won't change upstream as it was generated years back, shortly before grub became grub-legacy. //offnote: I simply bumped this thread since its strange that no one replied to this mail for 4 days. Regards. Keshav
