On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:20:53 +0200 Seblu <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 6:16 PM, keenerd <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 8/12/11, François Boulogne <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> So make it world-readable. > >> > >> > > > > I am entirely against any sort of closed private ML. Private but > > world-readable is a good way to maintain a good S/N while keeping us > > clean. > > > > On a related note, the fact that there is no public log of the TU IRC > > channel feels really shady. We don't even discuss "important" secrets > > like April Fools in the channel, and there is no reason for it to be > > private. The Gentoo-dev channel (where you must have voice/op to > > post, but anyone can lurk) is better, transparent and accountable. > > Closed doors suck. > > I agree with you. But arch already have arch-dev which is not public. > > >
That's an interesting point. What if everything we did now on arch-dev would become publicly readable.. that would mean a subgroup of the community would be aware of things such as our finances, who we are considering bringing in as a developer, what's going on with Arch legally, infrastructure related things, security issues or april fools jokes we are working on. I've always wanted to move *some* discussions from arch-dev to arch-dev-public but this is a bit more extreme. Not necessarily bad though, something to ponder. Dieter
