Thank you very much for your help :) I really think AUR should not be like a torrent site. Im not a moralist, and I have used abandonware myself. XD
But I really think aur is not the place for that, and of course, is not the place for "office ultrawarez full editon 2011" (lol) but it can be the place for a demo edition. thank you Ray rashif for helping to clarify this, and thank you to everyone :D --- El vie 28-oct-11, Ray Rashif <[email protected]> escribió: > De: Ray Rashif <[email protected]> > Asunto: Re: [aur-general] Request to add a rule > A: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > <[email protected]> > Fecha: viernes, 28 de octubre de 2011, 17:29 > On 29 October 2011 06:14, Ray Rashif > <[email protected]> > wrote: > > * Uploading a "Microsoft Office 2011 Demo" PKGBUID > that retrieves an > > official *non-redistributable* archive containing > clean executables is > > WRONG. > > Ammendment to this part: > > * Uploading a "Microsoft Office 2011 Demo" PKGBUILD that > retrieves > *from a third-party site* an official *non-redistributable* > archive > containing clean executables is WRONG. > > * Uploading a "Microsoft Office 2011 Demo" PKGBUILD that > retrieves > *from the official site* an official *non-redistributable* > archive > containing clean executables is RIGHT, *unless linking > from > third-party sites is explicitly forbidden*. > > > -- > GPG/PGP ID: 8AADBB10 >
