On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Smartboy <[email protected]> wrote:> Just wondering, as a user, does this mean Pacman will now complain if one> builds and installs unsigned packages from the AUR? nope, pacman -U would work the same way. >> Smartboy>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Pierre Schmitz >> <[email protected]> wrote:>>> Hi all,>>>> as discussed all new packages >> have to be signed from now on. This mean>> that if you use a build server >> you have to download the package to>> create the signature. Also see>> >> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Signing_Packages>>>> A >> new version of devtools will follow soon.>>>> Greetings,>>>> Pierre>>>> -->> >> Pierre Schmitz, http://pierre-schmitz.com>>> * * *
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Philipp Überbacher <[email protected]> wrote: > Excerpts from Pierre Schmitz's message of 2011-11-01 15:40:53 +0100: >> Hi all, >> >> as discussed all new packages have to be signed from now on. This mean >> that if you use a build server you have to download the package to >> create the signature. Also see >> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Signing_Packages >> >> A new version of devtools will follow soon. >> >> Greetings, >> >> Pierre > > Did this go to the right list? Was it only meant for TUs? If neither, > please elaborate. > > Philipp > > > To: Public mailing list for Arch Linux > development> <[email protected]>, "Discussion about the Arch User > Repository> (AUR)" <[email protected]> -- Kwpolska <http://kwpolska.tk> stop html mail | always bottom-post www.asciiribbon.org | www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html GPG KEY: 5EAAEA16 | Arch Linux x86_64, zsh, mutt, vim. # vim:set textwidth=70:
