Hello Ray and thanks for your reply!
On 3 January 2012 07:39, Eduardo Martins Lopes <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello guys, >> I have an aur package >> (opencv-tbb https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42121) that depends on >> intel-tbb, but this one is an orphaned community package and i would like to >> maintain it. Can i upload a pkbuild to the AUR (perhaps with the same name) >> ? There a few other orphans that would like to adopt, if it's possible: >> * libmatio - >> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/libmatio/ >> * arpack - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/arpack/ >> * xmlrpc-c - >> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/xmlrpc-c/ >> * aspell-pt - http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/aspell-pt/ >> Although i do not use the last ones (except for the dictionary), they fall >> within the scope of my interests. >Hello >I was supposed to bring intel-tbb to extra and build opencv against >it. I will do that soon, so you don't have to worry about that one >anymore and opencv from repos will have intel-tbb improvement. These are great news! >As for the others, it depends on the maintainer, the package >popularity, whether it is in use as a make or optional dependency etc. Actually the question regarding the names is about creating an aur package with the same name of the orphaned ones since the aur is where i can maintain those packages.
