On 01/08/2012 12:11 PM, Luca Bennati wrote: > This is the context: > gle (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1863) is outdated and > orphaned. I prepared a new PKGBUILD, but then I found those other packages > on AUR: > gle-graphics (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31267) also > outdated but not orphaned > gle4 (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12162) outdated, orphaned > and a clear dup > > Now, while it is clear that gle4 should be removed or at least merged, I > would like to ask which package between gle and gle-graphics would be > merged in the other. > Upstream site names it 'GLE', but in some part of the tarball it's called > 'gle-graphics'. > What is the official stance?
I've merged gle4 botes with gle. Gle-graphics doesn't seem to be out-of-date for me. Anyway, I would keep it in AUR, if it isn't part of gle package. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User http://archlinux.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
