So, the 45 days that lapsed since it's been flagged out of date isn't enough?
Seems to me after 6 weeks, why bother? If not 6 weeks, what reasonable amount of time makes this step unnecessary? I want to fix the package, not deal with waiting on somebody else who may or may not get to it for another two weeks. Just a thought. On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Peter Lewis <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > On Friday 13 Jan 2012 03:01:52 Ernie Brodeur wrote: > > The package charles-3.6.3-1 has been flagged out of date since nov 30th. > > I would like to adopt it, is it possible to get it disowned? > > Please send an email to the maintainer first, asking them to update it, or > if > you can take over. If you don't receive a reply within a reasonable amount > of > time (e.g. two weeks), please come back to us with a request. > > Thanks, > > Pete. >
