On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 13:44, Massimiliano Torromeo <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Keshav P R <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 20:34, Keshav P R <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 19:50, Keshav P R <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> Please delete elilo-git >>>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45565 . It uses my own git >>>> mirror of upstram cvs repo as source (no elilo-cvs package). I have >>>> created elilo-x86_64 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56750 >>>> to replace it, which uses upstream release tarballs. Thanks in >>>> advance. >>>> >>>> Regards. >>>> >>>> Keshav >>> >>> Also delete grub-legacy-efi-fedora >>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47979 , replaced by >>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56751 . >>> >>> - Keshav >> >> bump^2 > > The reason nobody is willing to do this is probably because your > package is obviously badly named (elilo-x86_64). There is no reason to > name the package so. If it is x86_64 only, just put only x86_64 in > arch=() instead of any, and just name the package "elilo". >
Have you ever tried uefi booting? Or tried to find out why there are two grub2-efi packages in extra repo. I think https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Unified_Extensible_Firmware_Interface#Detecting_UEFI_Firmware_Arch should answer your question (or https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/grub2-efi-x86_64/trunk/PKGBUILD). That x86_64 denoted UEFI ARCH which is independent of Kernel ARCH. Same reason for grub-legacy-efi-fedora. > If instead x86_64 is a build-only requirement, you should still name > the package as just "elilo" and leave the compile time check that you > did already put in place. > > Either way I don't see a valid reason to name it elilo-x86_64, but if > you think we missed something, please clarify. > > Thanks. If you wanted clarification you could have asked instead of waiting for me to bump this. I can't read your mind to understand why this was IGNORED. Asking for clarification is ok but ignoring the mail totally is not. It shouldn't take you 3 days + bump to reply to my mail. That's a basic courtesy any one would expect. Some reply to the mail should have been given, especially when you guys have replied to other such removal requests. Regards. Keshav
