On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: > Am Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:40:55 +1000 > schrieb Allan McRae <[email protected]>: > > > Where is it written that you can't do that? PKGBUILDs are bash. Any > > valid bash is a valid PKGBUILD. > > So, what if I would build a package which contains an .install file > with an `rm -Rf /` in its post_install() function and upload it to AUR? > That's a totally valid package, totally valid bash, which can easily be > uploaded to AUR and flawlessly installed with makepkg and every AUR > helper. Is it a qualitative good package? > > So, it's obvious that a valid bash is not the only quality criterion. > >
Quality and validity are two different things. -- Cédric Girard
